Kacam.net

Databases

联合索引的顺序

(user_id, status) 这个索引,单查 status 为什么用不上?

Copy the prompt, then pick a model. It plays the interviewer and asks you through it scene by scene instead of handing you the answer.

On a phone with the app installed, the system opens the app directly. Links cannot open external apps inside WeChat — open it in a browser first.

The copied text ends with the answer key the model grades you against. Don't read it yourself first — working it out on your own is the point.

这一份是整个系列的地基:说不清叶子节点上是什么顺序的人,后面几份里「锁加在索引上」「扫描行数为什么这么大」都会跟着糊。

它不会给你「最左前缀」这四个字。它会让你先把六条记录按索引里的顺序抄一遍,然后一条条问哪些查询用得上 —— 你自己抄过那一串,规则就不用背了。

第三幕最值钱:索引是 (user_id, created_at, status),查询三个条件都写了 —— 有几列是真的用来定位的? 多数人第一次都答「三列」。

★★★☆☆ · about 35 min · Tests: 叶子上的字典序、最左前缀、范围列之后、排序能不能免掉

What this one drills

Index structure Used or not used

Have you done this one?

Sign in to mark this one as practised — next time you come back you'll see when you did it.

Notes from people who did this one

Nobody has written yet. After you run it, say what came out of the conversation — which scene stumped you, which conclusion you changed afterwards.

Sign in to write a note.

How to use this

These are learning drills: the model guides, it does not corner you. When you get stuck it first asks which layer you are stuck at (never heard of it / know it but not why / know why but cannot apply it), then decides what to give. It only explains after guiding twice, and then asks you to say it back in your own words.

It assumes MySQL / InnoDB by default — half the traps here are implementation details, and clustered indexes, back-to-the-table lookups and gap locks work differently elsewhere. PostgreSQL or anything else is fine: say so in your first message and it will follow your engine, calling out where the conclusions differ.

How to start

  1. Pick one, open it, copy the prompt.
  2. Paste it into a fresh, empty chat, and say which engine and version you use first (say nothing and it assumes MySQL 8).
  3. Then say nothing else and wait for its first question.

Four commands you can call out any time

  • 跳过 Move on to the next scene
  • 换个说法 Explain this bit from another angle
  • 直说吧 Give the full answer, then make me say it back
  • 复盘 Jump straight to the wrap-up card

Three traps

  • Do not read the answer key at the end first — the "what people get wrong" section is the answer to every question in the drill.
  • Expect to be pushed for numbers. "A bit faster", "saves IO" gets cut off on the spot: how many rows? how many times? how many times faster? A conclusion with no number behind it is memorised.
  • The moment it starts praising you, point it back at the "do not praise me" rule. Guiding is not coddling.

Start with the composite index one — it is the foundation here; "locks sit on index records" and "why is it scanning so many rows" both lean on its one-line model. If concurrency is biting you in production, start with read-modify-write instead; if queries are slow, start with the execution plan one.