Kacam.net

Product design

前十个用户

说出十个名字 —— 你希望他们成为第一批用户。

Copy the prompt, then pick a model. It plays the interviewer and asks you through it scene by scene instead of handing you the answer.

On a phone with the app installed, the system opens the app directly. Links cannot open external apps inside WeChat — open it in a browser first.

The copied text ends with the answer key the model grades you against. Don't read it yourself first — working it out on your own is the point.

第二句话它就会让你报十个名字。报不出来,这一场后面所有的回答都要打折 —— 说不出名字的「目标用户」还停在人群描述上。

然后它会追一件很多人没意识到的事:你是问「你会不会用」,还是问「你上次遇到这个问题是什么时候」? 前者收到的全是客气话。

主战场的设定是:不许做任何推广,也不许发朋友圈,你怎么拿到前十个。 顺着会问到手工做的价值、什么时候必须停,以及那条最容易自欺的:第 11 到 100 个和前十个不是同一条路。

边界:它不预测这个点子能不能成,也不替你决定做不做。

★★★★☆ · about 35 min · Tests: 十个具体的人、问法决定答案、手工做什么时候停、第 11 到 100 个从哪来

What this one tests

Framing the real problem Evidence and numbers Funnels and retention

Have you done this one?

Sign in to mark this one as practised — next time you come back you'll see when you did it.

Notes from people who did this one

Nobody has written yet. After you run it, say what came out of the conversation — which scene stumped you, which conclusion you changed afterwards.

Sign in to write a note.

How to use this

There is no model answer here — but there are definite wrong answers. Only three things make a case hold up, and every prompt's answer key carries a "common wrong answers" section that is more useful than the checklist itself.

The three things that make it hold up

  1. You can say whose problem this is and what it is — **with evidence** (not "I think users would want it")
  2. You can say what success looks like — **and what that number is today** (no baseline, no acceptance criteria)
  3. You can name the cost and what you gave up — **the hardest one to fake**, which is why every prompt hunts for it

How to start

  1. Pick a question, open it, copy the prompt.
  2. Paste it into a brand-new conversation — not one where you already discussed it.
  3. Say nothing. Wait for its first question.

Four commands you can call out at any time

  • 跳过 move to the next scene now
  • 提示 give a direction, not the answer
  • 直说吧 spell this point out in full, then keep pressing on the trade-offs
  • 复盘 jump to the wrap-up and print the review card

Three traps

  • Don't rush to a solution. More than half the lost points here come from designing before asking — especially describing features before defining what success means.
  • Expect to be pushed for numbers. "It'll perform better", "users will like it" get cut off: which metric, what is it today, and when do you look?
  • When it starts praising you, point it back to rule five — feeling validated crowds out noticing what you missed.

Start with the north star metric; it underpins everything else. Then pick by what's on your plate: a backlog you can't order → prioritisation; nobody using it or retention sliding → retention and onboarding; need to price something → pricing. Save the experiment review for later, and keep redoing the one about turning a one-line request into a spec — it's the closest to daily work.