Kacam.net

Observe the world

Your own work: made specific

You bring the material; we wrote the answer key. Only you know why your release slipped — but slipped releases have about five root causes, each with its own early warning sign. Bring one concrete thing: a delay, a feature nobody used, a proposal you're about to pitch.

These prompts only exist in 简体中文 for now.

How to use this

The more specific the prompt, the sharper the grading: each specific one carries the root-cause checklist for that kind of situation, and the generic group is the fallback when none of them fits. The system design set grades you on "a benefit with no cost attached means you memorised it"; here the line is different: if you can't give a specific, it's empty.

How to start

  1. Pick one, open it, copy the prompt.
  2. Paste it into a brand-new conversation.
  3. Say in a sentence or two which thing you're going to talk about, then wait for its questions — unlike the system design set, where you say nothing after pasting.

Three commands you can call out at any time

  • 跳过 move to the next scene now
  • 换一个 start over with a different project, outage or experience
  • 复盘 jump to the wrap-up and print the review card

Three traps

  • When it starts consoling you, point it back to the "don't praise me" rule — the two retrospectives are the likeliest to summon a model's soothing persona, which turns the whole thing into emotional support rather than a retrospective.
  • Cut it off when it tries to complete your answer for you. You say "I don't remember", it offers "probably because the schedule was tight" — and that sentence is no longer your memory.
  • Before pasting a CV or a design doc, strip out phone numbers, email addresses and anything your company wouldn't want leaving the building.

Got a proposal to pitch? Start with defending it. Just finished a project or lived through an outage? Do those retrospectives while you still remember. Job hunting? Audit the CV first, then take the lines that survived into the behavioural drill.

Retrospectives

复盘一次上线延期
「那次是因为需求老变」——那你最早哪天就知道要延了?那天说了吗?
★★★☆☆ · about 35 min
复盘一个做了没人用的功能
做出来了没人用 —— 是没人看见,还是看见了不用?
★★★☆☆ · about 35 min
复盘一次数据不一致
「有几条对不上,改了一下」——你怎么知道现在全都修完了?
★★★★☆ · about 40 min

Defending a proposal

答辩:重构还是重写
默认答案是重构,重写要你举证 —— 举得出来吗?
★★★★☆ · about 40 min
答辩:自研还是买
「这个我们自己能写」——能写不等于该写。
★★★★☆ · about 35 min
答辩:要不要加这层缓存
「这里慢,加个缓存吧」——这个数据能容忍多旧?谁来失效它?
★★★★☆ · about 35 min

Academic

答辩:你的论文
用一句话说:你这篇论文,别人以前做不到的是什么?
★★★★☆ · about 45 min
复试:讲你做过的研究
「这件事里,哪一部分是你自己做的?」
★★★☆☆ · about 40 min
回应审稿意见
「审稿人没看懂」——那他为什么会这么理解?
★★★★☆ · about 40 min

Interviews

行为面试:讲一段经历
七类经历,逐段挖 S / T / A / R —— 尤其是最容易空掉的那个 R。
★★★☆☆ · about 35 min
简历拷问
贴进去,一条一条问「这句凭什么信」——它不替你改,只告诉你哪句撑不住。
★★★☆☆ · about 35 min

Fallback

复盘一个做完的项目
手上那件事在上面找不到对应的那一份时,用这个。
★★★☆☆ · about 40 min
复盘一次线上故障
故障复盘的通用版 —— 数据不一致那一类另有专门的一份。
★★★★☆ · about 40 min
方案答辩
方案答辩的通用版 —— 重写、自研、加缓存那几类另有专门的一份。
★★★★☆ · about 45 min
These prompts are open source They live in the public kacam-net/hero-prompts repo. If one of them doesn't press hard enough, or its answer key is missing a line, go and change it — whether it ships here is a separate call, made by the catalogue on this side.